Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Linlu Ma, Xinghuan Wang, Zhihua Yang, Di Huang, Hong Weng, Xian‐Tao Zeng
Journal
- ISSN / E-ISSN
- — / —
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8 ↗
- Volume · Issue · Pages
- 7 · 1 · 7-7
- Publisher
- BioMed Central Ltd.
- Article URL
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8 ↗
- Article details
- Unverified
Publication date (each date has its type and source)
28 Feb 2020
OpenAlex publication date · source: OpenAlex
| Type | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAlex publication date | 28 Feb 2020 | OpenAlex |
Keywords (as given): methodological quality assessment; risk of bias; quality assessment tools; randomized controlled trials; observational studies; cohort studies; case-control study; cross-sectional study; diagnostic studies; health economic evaluation; prediction model; patient-reported outcome measures; measurement validity; reliability statistics; systematic reviews; comparative effectiveness research; animal studies
HEC Status at Publication Not the journal's current status
HEC Status at PublicationNot conclusive
Historical status could not be conclusively determined.
- HEC status cannot be determined for this date: no HEC list is recorded as in effect on it.
Best available information, not a definitive status: HEC status cannot be determined for this date: no HEC list is recorded as in effect on it.
- Journal
- Military Medical Research
- Publication date used
- 28 Feb 2020 (OpenAlex publication date)
- Applicable HEC period
- None recorded for this date
- Category
- —
- Recognition status
- Unknown (NO_PERIOD_FOR_DATE)
- Source
- —
- Verification status
- Not available
This is an automatically generated summary based on the information available on the publication date. Terms & conditions apply.