Efficacy and safety of pulsed‐field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Ahmed Mazen Amin, Abubakar Nazir, Mohamed T. Abuelazm, Ahmed Abd Alrahman Ibrahim, Hossam Elbenawi, Aya Moustafa Aboutaleb, Mohamed Ellabban, Moumen Arnaout, Mustafa M. Turkmani, Basel Abdelazeem, Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal
- ISSN / E-ISSN
- — / —
- DOI
- 10.1002/joa3.13118 ↗
- Volume · Issue · Pages
- 40 · 5 · 1059-1074
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Article URL
- https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13118 ↗
- Article details
- Unverified
Publication date (each date has its type and source)
18 Jul 2024
OpenAlex publication date · source: OpenAlex
| Type | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAlex publication date | 18 Jul 2024 | OpenAlex |
Keywords (as given): pulsed field ablation; atrial fibrillation; thermal ablation; radiofrequency ablation; cryoablation; atrial fibrillation recurrence; procedure time; phrenic nerve palsy; esophageal lesions; cardiac tamponade; procedural safety; arrhythmia recurrence; heart rate changes; ablation complications; catheter ablation
HEC Status at Publication Not the journal's current status
HEC Status at PublicationConclusive
HEC status at publication
Recognized
W
Based on the recorded HEC dataset applicable to the article's publication date. Listed as W in the HEC list for 2023–24.
- Journal
- Journal of Arrhythmia
- Publication date used
- 18 Jul 2024 (OpenAlex publication date)
- Applicable HEC period
- 2023–24 (version 1) · 01 Jul 2023 – 30 Sep 2024
- Category
- W
- Recognition status
- Recognized (OK_RECORD_FOUND)
- Source
- HJRS 2023-24 page 2350, row 16587
- Verification status
- Verified against source · last verified 23 Sep 2026
This is an automatically generated summary based on the information available on the publication date. Terms & conditions apply.
