Efficacy and safety of pulsed‐field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Ahmed Mazen Amin, Abubakar Nazir, Mohamed T. Abuelazm, Ahmed Abd Alrahman Ibrahim, Hossam Elbenawi, Aya Moustafa Aboutaleb, Mohamed Ellabban, Moumen Arnaout, Mustafa M. Turkmani, Basel Abdelazeem, Annabelle Santos Volgman
ISSN / E-ISSN
— / —
DOI
10.1002/joa3.13118 ↗
Volume · Issue · Pages
40 · 5 · 1059-1074
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Article URL
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13118 ↗
Article details
Unverified
Publication date (each date has its type and source)
18 Jul 2024
OpenAlex publication date · source: OpenAlex
Dates on record for this article
TypeDateSource
OpenAlex publication date18 Jul 2024 OpenAlex

Keywords (as given): pulsed field ablation; atrial fibrillation; thermal ablation; radiofrequency ablation; cryoablation; atrial fibrillation recurrence; procedure time; phrenic nerve palsy; esophageal lesions; cardiac tamponade; procedural safety; arrhythmia recurrence; heart rate changes; ablation complications; catheter ablation

HEC Status at Publication Not the journal's current status

HEC Status at PublicationConclusive
HEC status at publication Recognized W
Based on the recorded HEC dataset applicable to the article's publication date. Listed as W in the HEC list for 2023–24.
Journal
Journal of Arrhythmia
Publication date used
18 Jul 2024 (OpenAlex publication date)
Applicable HEC period
2023–24 (version 1) · 01 Jul 2023 – 30 Sep 2024
Category
W
Recognition status
Recognized (OK_RECORD_FOUND)
Source
HJRS 2023-24 page 2350, row 16587
Verification status
Verified against source · last verified 23 Sep 2026
This is an automatically generated summary based on the information available on the publication date. Terms & conditions apply.